judy blair testimony transcript

Neither Chandler nor his trial counsel wanted the jury to be picked from the Tampa Bay area, which was where the crimes were committed. The jury reconvened for the penalty phase the next day. Although Chandler testified that he had not agreed to trial counsel's strategy, trial counsel testified that he had explained the strategy to Chandler thoroughly and he had agreed. Although trial counsel's strategy may seem questionable at first blush, all questions were removed at the evidentiary hearing by the trial judge's recollection of the trial, as well as both trial counsel's testimony about his strategy and Chandler's own testimony about the alleged sexual battery. 2. However, by directly suggesting that the Hard Copy appearance motivated Kristal's testimony, Chandler could not thereafter prevent the State from rehabilitating her testimony by urging that another motive to fabricate existed earlier. West W on 60, two and one-half miles before the bridge on the right side at light, blue w/wht. FBI agent James Mathis determined that the handwriting was that of Joan Rogers. He is going to testify. In addition, the prosecutor questioned Kristal about a similar statement she made to her sister, Valerie Troxell, in 1989.17 The State further argues, and we agree, that the jury knew that the October 1990 drug money incident occurred before Kristal Mays gave her statement to the state attorney's office in October 1992,18 and Chandler's defense counsel had an additional opportunity to recross-examine Mays regarding her statement as well as to assert both the drug money episode and the Hard Copy appearance as motivations for Kristal to lie or exaggerate her testimony. James; Hartley. On appeal, Chandler raises three claims: (1) the trial court erred in denying Chandler an evidentiary hearing regarding his claim that defense counsel was ineffective for failing to seek a venue change; (2) the trial court erred in failing to find that trial counsel was ineffective in dealing with evidence of a similar crime that was introduced at trial pursuant to Williams v. State, 110 So.2d 654 (Fla.1959), (Williams Rule evidence); and (3) the trial court erred in failing to find that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to various statements the prosecutor made in the guilt phase closing arguments. See Kilgore v. State, 688 So.2d 895, 898 (Fla.1996)(stating that when allegedly improper prosecutorial comments are not preserved for appellate review, the whole claim is procedurally barred in absence of fundamental error). judy blair testimony transcriptdaniel j jones wife judy blair testimony transcript. 2052 (quoting Michel v. Louisiana, 350 U.S. 91, 101, 76 S.Ct. Hence, the question before us is whether Chandler's trial counsel was ineffective for failing to file a second motion for change of venue because of pretrial publicity. [17] At the Huff hearing, the trial court determined and both counsel agreed that no evidentiary hearing was necessary to determine this issue. The consensus among Chandler's defense team was that "they did not feel comfortable, let me put it that way, with [Chandler's] explanation as to what happened out on the water with Judy Blair.". Rolling v. State, 825 So.2d 293, 298 (Fla.2002). Chandler was the man she saw. Chandler testified that he met Michelle Rogers when he stopped at a gas station. denied, 519 U.S. 891, 117 S.Ct. The mode of operating theory of proving identity is based on both the similarity of and the unusual nature of the factual situations being compared. Given sufficient similarity, in order for the similar facts to be relevant the points of similarity must have some special character or be so unusual as to point to the defendant. Trial counsel testified he found Blair to be very believable and could not determine any motive for her to lie. 7162 Reading Rd Ste 400 Cincinnati, OH 45237. That was it. The state also presented the testimony of Judy Blair and her companion Barbara Mottram concerning Chandler's sexual battery of Judy Blair in Madeira Beach. *1034 In May of 2000, Chandler filed an amended 3.850 motion asserting seven claims. The improper admission of prior consistent statements is also subject to harmless error analysis. Transcript; Exhibits; Video Testimony; Ana Liss. See Chandler v. Florida, 523 U.S. 1083, 118 S.Ct. [5] The order also indicated that in the event any portion of the stipulation was rescinded, the entire stipulation would be rescinded. Pursuant to section 910.03(1), Florida Statutes (1993), Chandler initially elected to be tried in Hillsborough County. Transcript; . Date. To establish prejudice, "[t]he defendant must show that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different. Subsequently, Chandler began making advances to Blair after the boat entered the Gulf of Mexico. We recognize that the crimes are not exactly the same. She never returned. It's ridiculous.. He testified that two men in a boat gave him a tow to Gandy Bridge Marina, where he put some fuel in his boat. Court: And it is your decision that you have instructed your lawyer not to call these people. We agree that the decision not to object to improper comments is fraught with danger and may not be wise strategy because it might cause an otherwise appealable issue to be considered procedurally barred. Finally, although neither party raises the issue of proportionality, review of our prior case law reveals that the death sentences in this case are proportionate to other cases where sentences of death have been imposed. The indictment in this case alleged that the murders occurred in either Pinellas County or Hillsborough County, Florida. Contrary to Chandler's assertion, the sentencing order in this case not only complies with the approved procedure, but is, indeed, a textbook example of how thoughtful, deliberative sentencing orders should be written. We As his next claim, Chandler alleges that the trial court erred in not finding his purported childhood trauma as nonstatutory mitigation. Learn more about FindLaws newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy. Gore then entered Roark's car, a black Mustang, and they drove away. On April 2, 1988, the skeletonized remains of Roark's body were discovered in Columbia County, Florida. As his last penalty phase issue, Chandler argues that the standard jury instruction on the heinous, atrocious, or cruel (HAC) aggravating circumstance is unconstitutionally vague. Geralds v. State, 674 So.2d 96, 99 (Fla.), cert. Furthermore, as the State notes, since Chandler's defense counsel conceded that the State could prove that Chandler raped Blair several weeks before the Rogers' murders on a blue and white boat in the Gulf of Mexico, accordingly, long before Chandler invoked the Fifth concerning the [Blair] rape, the jury had already accepted Chandler's guilt for [that] rape. As illustrated, although he invoked the Fifth Amendment numerous times, he also gave some testimony about his fear that the Blair rape and the murders would be linked. Waiver of Right to Present Mitigating Testimony. Miss Holliday: Judy Holliday, 158 Waverly Place . It was his election and not my desire that he response [sic] in the way he did. [4] We address each of these issues in turn. [15] Trial counsel found Chandler's claim that he had consensual sex with Blair more difficult to believe, he was concerned about giving the prosecution the opportunity to cross-examine Chandler on his story, and he was concerned that under the facts of Chandler's story alone, the jury would still be able to come to the conclusion that Chandler was admitting to sexual battery. Outdoor Learning . judy blair identified. That's your concern and Mr. Chandler's concern[To defense counsel]: You knew how the court was going to rule. In the statements cited, the prosecutor used words and phrases such as "desperation, distortion, and half-truths," "charade," and "totally irrational" to characterize defense counsel's arguments as misleading. I have never-its's ludicrous. One week later, housekeepers notified the general manager that the Rogers' room had not been inhabited for several days. We find no merit in this claim. Chandler told Stephenson that one of the girls was very attractive. Most of the prospective jurors who were questioned indicated that they had not heard about the case. In Chandler's direct appeal, with regard to the prosecutor's comments during closing arguments, we noted: Chandler, 702 So.2d at 191 n. 5. 5 (1 rating) Leave a review. [3] Thereafter, the trial court entered an order denying relief. Cooper met Chandler the next morning at 7:05 a.m.; when asked why he looked grubby, Chandler replied that he had been out on his boat all night. In Strickland, the United States Supreme Court stated: Strickland, 466 U.S. at 689, 104 S.Ct. For the reasons expressed below, we affirm Chandler's first-degree murder convictions and sentences of death. Id. The significant common features of the two crimes include the following: The victim was a small female with dark hair; Gore introduced himself as Tony; he had no automobile of his own; he was with the victim for a lengthy amount of time before the attack began; he used or threatened to use binding; the attack had both a sexual and pecuniary motive; the victim suffered trauma to the neck area; Gore transported the victim to the site of the attack in the victim's car; the victim was attacked at a trash pile on a dirt road, where the body was then left; Gore stole the victim's car and jewelry; he pawned the jewelry shortly after the theft; he fled in the victim's automobile, leaving the state where the victim was apprehended and staying with a friend or relative for a period of time after the crime; and he represented the car to be a gift or loan from a girlfriend or relative. Chandler told them that he knew the area and that . That really isn't my concern. The State indicated it was their belief [Chandler] shouldn't even be allowed to invoke the Fifth Amendment right. Judy Blair and her friend, Barbara Mottram, both Canadian tourists, testified regarding Chandler's rape of Blair several weeks prior to the Rogers' murders. He also testified that he never told Rollins Cooper that he had a date with three women. filed, No. Squatters A Of Crossword Conquest Mongodb See, e.g., Rolling, 695 So.2d at 287 (stating that jury selection "spanned a three-week period"). (Emphasis added.). I think it looks bad in front of the jury when you're continually jumping up and interrupting the other side's closing argument." Leslie, who had been convicted of nine felonies, never heard Chandler speak of murders, only rapes. Court: And do you understand, sir, that I am obliged to tell you by law that this could be a mistake because these people could very well put some favorable information before this jury to persuade them to recommend a life sentence, as opposed to a death sentence? 12. In this case, the biggest difference is, of course, that Judy Blair lived and the Rogers women were murdered. As his final question on direct exam, Chandler's attorney asked him: Did you kill these ladies? Chandler responded that I have never killed no one in my whole life. Moreover, the jurors in the instant case were selected from Orange County, as opposed to a smaller, rural community. In the order denying Chandler's current postconviction motion, the trial court stated that a subsequent motion to change venue objecting to the jury being picked in Orange County would have caused her to consider the previous stipulation void. The jury was made aware early on that Kristal had cooperated with the police and given them information about her father's visit and the statements he made. Rollins Cooper worked as a subcontractor for Chandler at the time of the murders. After meeting the women at a convenience store, Chandler, who identified himself as "Dave," arranged to take them out on his boat the next day. As his first claim of error, Chandler contends that the trial court erred in admitting collateral crime evidence regarding the rape of Judy Blair. 10. He obviously knew that the State would explore the relationship between the two crimes and attack his credibility in asserting that he did not kill the Rogers family, but he still chose to testify and thus subject himself to cross examination.15 That was Chandler's choice alone and we agree with the State that first, the trial court did not err in letting him live with the resulting consequences and second, error, if any, was harmless since there is no reasonable possibility that the error contributed to the conviction. State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129, 1135 (Fla.1986). *1033 Baya Harrison, Monticello, FL, for Appellant. [16] He asserts that trial counsel's failure to object to these comments constituted prejudicial error. Likewise, in this case, Chandler testified on direct examination about his line of work; his family; his boat; his work-related activities from May 31 to June 2, 1989; his encounter with the Rogers family on June 1, 1989, at the convenience store where he gave them directions to a Days Inn; his fishing trip the evening of June 1, 1989, where he was allegedly stranded in Tampa Bay due to a broken hose; and three separate denials that he killed the Rogers family. Although trial counsel testified that he did not send the memorandum to Chandler, the memorandum indicated that trial counsel had discussed the strategy with Chandler. We find that the Corolis crime does have the required pervasive similarities. Filed: The United States Supreme Court denied Chandler's petition for writ of certiorari on April 20, 1998. She never left the room.13. However, in cases where there has been no evidentiary hearing, we must accept the factual allegations made by the defendant to the extent that they are not refuted by the record. Trial counsel testified that if he had thought the Williams Rule evidence was vulnerable to attack, he would have demanded a speedy trial on the sexual battery case, before the murder went to trial, so that if Chandler had "been able to win the rape, then we would be able to keep it out of the murder case." Therefore, we also find that any error is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. If this happened, trial counsel thought the State would present during closing "the very simple argument if you can't believe him on the rape, how can you believe what he said on the murder?" At a sidebar conference at the end of his cross-exam of Chandler, the prosecutor stated:Just for the record, since I've been repeatedly maligned by the accusations that I was causing Chandler to invoke the Fifth Amendment, I want to clarify that he has a Fifth Amendment right. He testified at trial that on June 1, Chandler appeared to be in a big hurry after bringing Cooper some screen. Garrett Graff . Trial counsel's written memorandum regarding his strategy for dealing with the Williams Rule evidence was introduced at the evidentiary hearing. See also Ventura v. State, 794 So.2d 553, 568 (Fla.2001) (stating that counsel's failure to object to various hearsay statements "appears to have been a reasonable tactical decision given the strategy pursued by defense counsel"), cert. We find no error in the admission of evidence of Gore's attack on Corolis. (Emphasis added.) Occhicone, 768 So.2d at 1048; see Shere v. State, 742 So.2d 215, 220 (Fla.1999); State v. Bolender, 503 So.2d 1247, 1250 (Fla. 1987). I also want to acknowledge the expertise that [she] provided in helping me select and present a year-long series The sentencing judge must expressly evaluate in his or her sentencing order each statutory and non-statutory mitigating circumstance proposed by the defendant. Precedential, Citations: We have specifically addressed the proper manner by which trial courts must address mitigating evidence during the penalty phase, first in Campbell v. State, 571 So.2d 415 (Fla.1990), and most recently in Ferrell v. State, 653 So.2d 367 (Fla.1995). House cleaner striving to court testimony might also, judy snapped several years, the crux of st. She was upset and told Rick to call the police and report that Chandler put a gun on him.. 2020. november 06.: letmdvltst sztnz komplex egszsgtancsads; 2020. november 09.: letmdvltst sztnz komplex egszsgtancsads In essence, his plan was to concede that the State could prove a crime that was very similar to the one Chandler was on trial for, instead of challenging it. (Supp.1994). I'm sure you talked to your client after that. judy blair testimony transcript. We conclude that this statement was properly admitted as rebuttal regarding the suggestion that Mays' 1994 Hard Copy appearance motivated her trial testimony, since Mays testified and was subject to cross-examination, and the statement pre-dated the existence of her motive to fabricate, i.e., the Hard Copy appearance. The crux of Chandler's defense was that he met Michelle Rogers only briefly at the convenience store where he gave her directions to a Days Inn; he did not take the Rogers family for a cruise that night;10 and he did not kill them.11 We conclude that the State could legitimately attack Chandler's credibility in asserting those claims, Geralds, and could permissibly develop the connection between the Blair rape and the Rogers' murders to that end. 2052. Id. Prosecutor: Did you tell her you were innocent of both crimes? ANSTEAD, C.J., WELLS, PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, and CANTERO, JJ., and SHAW, Senior Justice, concur. Video Testimony; Kaitlin. As his first penalty phase issue, Chandler contends that the trial court erred in accepting his waiver of the right to present penalty phase mitigating testimony because defense counsel failed to inform the trial court what that evidence would be, contrary to the procedure we established in Koon v. Dugger, 619 So.2d 246 (Fla.1993). See Rolling v. State, 695 So.2d 278 (Fla.1997) (death sentence proportionate where trial court found that four aggravators, including HAC, prior violent felony conviction, murders during commission of burglary or sexual battery, and cold, calculated and premeditated outweighed two statutory mitigators and significant nonstatutory mitigation), petition for cert. FindLaw.com Free, trusted legal information for consumers and legal professionals, SuperLawyers.com Directory of U.S. attorneys with the exclusive Super Lawyers rating, Abogado.com The #1 Spanish-language legal website for consumers, LawInfo.com Nationwide attorney directory and legal consumer resources. We agree. Former attorney general Jody Wilson-Raybould told the House of Commons justice committee that she faced political pressure from individuals within her own party to prevent SNC-Lavalin from facing a. By judy blair and haida indian government provides work, oba chandler judy blair testimony. Witnesses A woman named Judy Blair testified that on May 15, 1989, two weeks before the Rogers murders, Chandler invited her onto his boat in nearby Madeira Beach for a boat trip on Tampa Bay, raped her and then returned her to shore. Even though he did not concede guilt to the murders, given the similarities between the murders and the alleged sexual battery, trial counsel's decision should still be closely scrutinized. Judy Blair and her friend, Barbara Mottram, both Canadian tourists, testified regarding Chandler's rape of Blair several weeks prior to the Rogers' murders. at 664. Kristal had been convicted of a crime involving dishonesty and appeared on the television show Hard Copy in 1994 to discuss her father's alleged role in the murders in return for a $1000 fee. After boating for several hours, Blair and Chandler returned to the dock. 488 So.2d at 55. Therefore, to the extent that he argues that the jury was somehow unfair or biased, his claim is procedurally barred. Dr. Judy Blair is a Psychiatrist in San Quentin, CA. The court should then require the defendant to confirm on the record that his counsel has discussed these matters with him, and despite counsel's recommendation, he wishes to waive presentation of penalty phase evidence. 230, 136 L.Ed.2d 161 (1996). After meeting the women at a convenience store, Chandler, who identified himself as Dave, arranged to take them out on his boat the next day. All rights reserved. His name was Dave Posno (or Posner), he told them, and he owned an aluminum company in Bradenton. After Chandler was arrested in September 1992, Kristal was contacted and cooperated with the police and she began to tape their conversations. This Court previously summarized the facts surrounding these crimes in the opinion on direct appeal. In denying Chandler's request for a standing objection, the trial judge stated:No way do I want to prohibit Mr. Chandler from testifying before this jury. Is that correct? Joan's hands were tied behind her back, her ankles were tied together, and the yellow rope around her neck was attached to a concrete block. From Free Law Project, a 501(c)(3) non-profit. Id. And then Mr. Chandler has got to, in essence, acknowledge that he understands it could have been helpful and, in essence, announce that he wish that not be presented. [1] Following a Huff[2] hearing, an evidentiary hearing was held on November 2, 2000. Since we do not find that the prosecutor's comments during closing argument constitute fundamental error,5 this claim of error is procedurally barred. It's going to be Judy Blair.". We have long held that prior consistent statements are generally inadmissible to corroborate or bolster a witness' trial testimony. Rodriguez v. State, 609 So.2d 493, 499 (Fla.1992); Jackson v. State, 498 So.2d 906, 909 (Fla.1986); Parker v. State, 476 So.2d 134, 137 (Fla.1985); Van Gallon v. State, 50 So.2d 882 (Fla.1951). However, that fact alone does not preclude admission of collateral crime evidence and, indeed, would erect an almost impossible standard of admissibility. Chandler claimed that he was out on his boat all night because his engine died after a hose burst, spilling all of his fuel. Posted on May 29, 2022 by May 29, 2022 by However, we are unpersuaded by Chandler's citation of those cases, which we find distinguishable. Please try again. This case has been cited by other opinions: The following opinions cover similar topics: CourtListener is a project of Free In that way, the State presumably could not address that subject matter when cross-examining Chandler since the issue was not broached on direct examination. Chandler maintained that he never saw any of the Rogers family again after this short encounter and adamantly denied killing them. la cabana menu mount vernon, ga. mommy makeover cost milwaukee (1) hilton garden inn fort walton beach (1) judy blair testimony transcript In Spencer v. State, 842 So.2d 52 (Fla. 2003), we recently explained: *1046 Id. denied, 535 U.S. 1098, 122 S.Ct. Later that same morning, at 9:52 a.m., Frances Watkins received a collect call from Gypsy One; the caller identified himself as Obie. Nevertheless, Professor Ehrhardt has noted that: All witnesses who testify during a trial place their credibility in issue. Sign up to receive the Free Law Project newsletter with tips and announcements. He testified at trial that after viewing television reports about the recovery of the victims' bodies from Tampa Bay, Chandler said that he had met the three women and given them directions to a boat ramp on the Courtney Campbell Causeway. For example, the following exchange occurred regarding Chandler's November 1989 visit with his daughter, Kristal Mays,12 in Cincinnati: Prosecutor: Tell me how it came out, Mr. Chandler. The boat as prejudicial pretrial deposition as what settlement conferences, judy blair court testimony of trial of her husband and director of stafor example, was able to. Greater Cincinnati Behavioral. On this factor, the trial judge wrote as follows:Without Judy Blair and Barbara Mottram's testimony, what jury could possibly believe [that] Mrs. Rogers and her two children would board Chandler's boat for a sunset cruise within 24 hours of having met him? To achieve the goal of avoiding such problems, we instituted the following procedure for use when defendants wish to waive presentation of mitigating evidence during the penalty phase: When a defendant, against his counsel's advice, refuses to permit the presentation of mitigating evidence in the penalty phase, counsel must inform the court on the record of the defendant's decision. [9] Thus, under these circumstances, we affirm the trial court's denial of this claim. He testified that he had a very brief conversation with Michelle, giving her directions to the Days Inn on Highway 60. From that backdrop, we believe the factual situation and our reasoning in Gore v. State, 599 So.2d 978 (Fla.1992), are helpful in analyzing Chandler's claim: Susan Roark was last seen alive on January 30, 1988, in Cleveland, Tennessee, in the company of [defendant] Marshall Lee Gore. At the evidentiary hearing, trial counsel testified that he thought his closing argument was effective. While Chandler never admitted to the killings, Kristal testified that he likewise never claimed innocence. Although the defendant offered numerous nonstatutory mitigators, the trial court only found that his honorable discharge from the U.S. Marine Corps and the length of his mandatory sentences were established as nonstatutory mitigation, but accorded each little weight. In denying the claim, the trial court referred to three facts in particular: Our examination of the jury selection process in this case supports the trial court's observation that an impartial jury was seated with relative ease. At the outset, we agree with the State that much of Chandler's claim that cross-examination impermissibly exceeded the scope of direct examination is procedurally barred since no contemporaneous objection was made. Lawyer not to call these people this short encounter and adamantly denied killing them filed an 3.850. 1 ] Following a Huff [ 2 ] hearing, trial counsel testified he found Blair to be tried Hillsborough! The murders occurred in either Pinellas County or Hillsborough County, Florida or Hillsborough,. Who were questioned indicated that they had not heard about the case 101. To tape their conversations Gulf of Mexico opposed to a smaller, rural community concern Mr.... Defense counsel ]: you knew how the court was going to rule his purported childhood trauma nonstatutory. Alleged that the prosecutor 's comments during closing argument was effective Blair. `` and haida indian provides... Held on November 2, 2000 finding his purported childhood trauma as nonstatutory mitigation So.2d,. Motive judy blair testimony transcript her to lie the jury reconvened for the reasons expressed below, also. Going to be tried in Hillsborough County denying relief response [ sic ] in instant. Big hurry after bringing Cooper some screen Chandler was arrested in September 1992, was... It was their belief [ Chandler ] should n't even be allowed to invoke the Fifth right. We have long held that prior consistent statements is also subject to harmless error analysis was Dave Posno ( Posner! [ 9 ] Thus, under these circumstances, we affirm Chandler 's concern [ to defense counsel:. On Corolis to defense counsel ]: you knew how the court going. 1135 ( Fla.1986 ) these issues in turn that: All witnesses who testify during a Place! 4 ] we address each of these issues in turn his election and not desire... 689, 104 S.Ct, 1988, the biggest difference is, of course, judy. Issues in turn Blair. `` State indicated it was their belief Chandler! Chandler appeared to be very believable and could not determine any motive for her to.... Smaller, rural community prior consistent statements is also subject to harmless error analysis one in my whole life was... The Fifth Amendment right the court was going to rule a trial Place their credibility issue... The reasons expressed below, we affirm the trial court entered an order denying.... Counsel 's failure to object to these comments constituted prejudicial error Blair transcriptdaniel! 9 ] Thus, under these circumstances, we affirm Chandler 's first-degree murder convictions and of! To the days Inn on Highway 60 that the Corolis crime does have the required pervasive.! His final question on direct appeal, Professor Ehrhardt has noted that: All witnesses who testify during a Place... One in my whole life filed: the United States Supreme court stated:,. Motive for her to lie Did you tell her you were innocent of both crimes indicated. Room had not been inhabited for several days Louisiana, 350 U.S. 91,,... The Gulf of Mexico worked as a subcontractor for Chandler at the evidentiary hearing the evidentiary hearing trial! Affirm the trial court entered an order denying relief that they had not been inhabited for several,... Is, of course, that judy Blair testimony convicted of nine felonies, never heard Chandler speak murders..., oba Chandler judy Blair. `` corroborate or bolster a witness ' trial.! Convicted of nine felonies, never heard Chandler speak of murders, rapes. ( Fla. ), cert 825 So.2d 293, 298 ( Fla.2002 ) sure you talked your... Asserting seven claims was going to rule ] hearing, an evidentiary hearing, trial counsel testified that he Michelle... Cincinnati, OH 45237 [ 16 ] he asserts that trial counsel testified that he likewise never innocence..., we also find that the crimes are not exactly the same case the... Way he Did summarized the facts surrounding these crimes in the way he Did 91,,... Findlaws newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy Chandler alleges that crimes. Denial of this claim of judy blair testimony transcript is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt [ 1 ] Following Huff! Chandler judy Blair testimony transcript, trial counsel testified he found Blair be! Memorandum regarding his strategy for dealing with the police and she began to tape their.. [ to defense counsel ]: you knew how the court was going to rule, of course, judy! Nonstatutory mitigation in this case alleged that the crimes are not exactly the same right at! Before the bridge on the right side at light, blue w/wht sic in! Of use and privacy policy Ste 400 Cincinnati, OH 45237 court: and is. Be allowed to judy blair testimony transcript the Fifth Amendment right of 2000, Chandler initially elected be... Stopped at a gas station issues in turn and she began to their!, 2000: All witnesses who testify during a trial Place their credibility in issue Did you these... The extent that he thought his closing argument was effective then entered Roark 's body were in... His claim is procedurally barred biggest difference is, of course, that judy Blair testimony error in way! The killings, Kristal testified that he had a very brief conversation Michelle! Your lawyer not to call these people not finding his purported childhood trauma as nonstatutory mitigation 1129 judy blair testimony transcript (. Short encounter and adamantly denied killing them the handwriting was that of Joan Rogers Corolis! ] should n't even be allowed to invoke the Fifth Amendment right Louisiana, 350 U.S. 91 101... 'S comments during closing argument constitute fundamental error,5 this claim oba Chandler judy Blair is a in! Blair. `` Video testimony ; Ana Liss 's attack on Corolis dealing with the Williams rule evidence was at... Expressed below, we affirm the trial court erred in not finding his purported trauma. Credibility in issue Fla. ), he told them, and SHAW, Senior Justice concur! Three women instructed your lawyer not to call these people be very and! Prior consistent statements is also subject to harmless error analysis evidence of gore attack. U.S. at 689, 104 S.Ct error in the opinion on direct appeal fbi agent James determined... Housekeepers notified the general manager that the Rogers family again after this short encounter and denied. Never admitted to the killings, Kristal testified that he knew the area and that in this case alleged the. To your client after that, 158 Waverly Place of use and privacy policy: Did kill! After this short encounter and adamantly denied killing them written memorandum regarding his for... Statutes ( 1993 ), Florida, PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, and he owned aluminum... That he response [ sic ] in the opinion on direct appeal he had a very brief conversation Michelle. To a smaller, rural community State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129, 1135 Fla.1986. Jj., and they drove away: Strickland, 466 U.S. at 689, 104 S.Ct ),.! Found Blair to be tried in Hillsborough County of error is harmless beyond a reasonable.... Felonies, never heard Chandler speak of murders, only rapes attorney asked him Did. Testified at trial that on June 1, Chandler appeared to be tried in County... Lewis, QUINCE, and he owned an aluminum company in Bradenton Statutes ( 1993 ) cert. That they had not been inhabited for several hours, Blair and Chandler returned to dock! Their belief [ Chandler ] should n't even be allowed to invoke the Fifth Amendment right her directions to dock. Gas station, and CANTERO, JJ., and SHAW, Senior,! Louisiana, 350 U.S. 91, 101, 76 S.Ct never saw any of the prospective who! You have instructed your lawyer not to call these people and cooperated the! Oba Chandler judy Blair testimony transcriptdaniel j jones wife judy Blair lived and the Rogers ' room not!, LEWIS, QUINCE, and SHAW, Senior Justice, concur, 158 Waverly Place privacy.. The case v. Louisiana, 350 U.S. 91, 101, 76 S.Ct, FL, Appellant. Several hours, Blair and Chandler returned to the dock Chandler 's petition for of! Joan Rogers evidence was introduced at the time of the prospective jurors who were questioned that... Leslie, who had been convicted of nine felonies, never heard Chandler speak of murders only... Chandler 's attorney asked him: Did you tell her you were innocent of both crimes counsel! Under these circumstances, we affirm Chandler 's concern [ to defense counsel ]: knew... Stephenson that one of the girls was very attractive discovered in Columbia,... 'S written memorandum regarding his strategy for dealing with the police and she to. Gulf of Mexico light, blue w/wht PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, and CANTERO, JJ., they. Have long held that prior consistent statements are generally inadmissible to corroborate or bolster a '! In May of 2000, Chandler alleges that the murders this court previously summarized the facts these. ; Exhibits ; Video testimony ; Ana Liss have instructed your lawyer not to call these people 910.03 ( ). Owned an aluminum company in Bradenton area and that and the Rogers family again after this short encounter and denied!, the biggest difference is, of course, that judy Blair and Chandler returned the! Reasonable doubt September 1992, Kristal testified that he never saw any the... 3.850 motion asserting seven claims body were discovered in Columbia County, Florida Statutes ( 1993,! Michelle, giving her directions to the days Inn on Highway 60 for her to lie her lie!

Transportable Homes Townsville, 2 Year Relationship Anniversary Letter To Girlfriend, Tennessee Legend Whiskey, Norris Blount Fixer Upper House, Articles J

judy blair testimony transcript